News
net.wars: ID cards update
by Wendy M Grossman | posted on 21 March 2005
This morning, just hours before the ID card goes to its second reading in the House of Lords sometime this afternoon, a research group from the London School of Economics released a report (PDF) pointing out 75 key flaws in the government's proposals.
Flaws include conflicts with existing national and international laws in the areas of data protection and human rights, as well as laws intended to ease the free movement within the EU.
There is technological uncertainty because no biometric system on this sort of scale has ever been tried anywhere in the world. The report notes that the government's claim that biometrics will have to be included on passports in any case to comply with the requirements of the International Civil Aviation Organization is not quite correct: the ICAO requires a digital photograph, not a biometric facial scan.
Finally, the costs are likely to be far greater – and far more visible to individuals – than even the government's current estimates.
More in Friday's net.wars.
You can discuss this article on our discussion board.
Wendy M. Grossman’s Web site has an extensive archive of her books, articles, and music, and an archive of all the earlier columns in this series. Readers are welcome to post here, at net.wars home, follow on Twitter or send email to netwars(at) skeptic.demon.co.uk (but please turn off HTML).
in News
The role of the ITSUG in the Ericsson vs Sendo case...
Why on earth is Ericsson suing Sendo over IP? Politics? or buy-out plans?
Swap husbands, have sex, take pix: just don't use MMS!
you're reading:
net.wars: ID cards update
Headsets could become compulsory for phones in USA because of "radiation" fears
Portable IT? metaphorically speaker -a review of portable USB squeakers!